COVID || To Vax or Not to Vax
You may have heard that anyone who expresses any reserve concerning the COVID vaccine is a 'conspiracy theorist' who does not follow the science. But have you closely examined their arguments? What if there was more to them than you thought?
Without counsel, purposes are disappointed, but in the multitude of counselors they are established.
Throughout Proverbs we are told that, in a "multitude of counselors" there is wisdom. Wisdom ultimately comes from God, but it is wise to seek counsel, praying that the Lord would lead us in it. So, will you let me add to the counsel you have already received regarding this very controversial vaccine? My aim is not to offend anyone, but to share some facts that you may not have heard or considered before...
When I became aware that many pastors and preachers used the pulpit to encourage their congregations to take the 'saviour' vaccine, I knew something had to be done. Even if no one was willing to hear, something had to be said.
The mere fact that ministers feel the need to promote vaccines, or in fact give any medical advice at the pulpit is extremely concerning. Firstly, is it biblical for them to do so? And secondly, are they even qualified to do so?
Is it the will of God for shepherds of the sheep to utilize the time and the influence given to them (by God) to be the mainstream media's spokespersons, merely repeating their well-know mantras about safety and efficacy, urging people to ignore critical thinking and just accept the propaganda that they have been spoon fed this past year? Is the Holy Spirit leading them to do so?
Many of us have been taught that copying another person's ministry and calling was wrong - because we all have our unique calling from God. This is a valid point, but on the other hand, it now seems totally fine to mimic earthly leaders' "ministries" and just parrot their words around! Should a minister really be the prophet of a worldly mindset in the Church? We must realise that the narratives of this world are deceitful. So is this case an exception?
Whether you are for the vaccine, against the vaccine or undecided, please read on. More knowledge can only be beneficial. The final decision regarding the vaccine is yours before God, but let it be a well informed one.
The UK Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, declared in December that pharmaceutical company Pfizer was “just like Jesus” and that their vaccine would "undoubtedly prove the salvation of what is left of the human race"1. It is "like a gift from God that came out of nowhere" according to mental health professionals in Chicago2.
The world is looking to the vaccine as the saviour that will deliver them out of a so-called pandemic crisis. They consider it a 'blessing' from Big Pharma. But should we, as believers, look to anyone or anything else than the Lord as our Saviour? We already have a very able Saviour, and Jesus alone has the power to heal and save. Another saviour would only be a counterfeit.
The vaccine is "the work of men's hands". Exalting the work of men's hands in the Bible, is called idolatry... May all our trust and hope be in the Lord Jesus!
Their idols are silver and gold, the work of men’s hands.
COVID VACCINE CONCERNS
Three different vaccines are currently in use in the UK and USA: Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna and Oxford AstraZeneca.
AstraZeneca is a GMO-based or recombinant vaccine.. It uses a weakened version of a common cold virus (adenovirus). This virus was genetically modified to include genetic material from the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. When injected, it pushes its DNA into the body's cells, including the genetic code for making the spike protein. The cells then use these DNA instructions to manufacture the spike protein parts of the virus (DNA -> RNA -> protein). The idea is that these parts will trigger an immune response and produce antibodies.3
Pfizer and Moderna are RNA-based vaccines. They inject a short sequence of synthetic messenger RNA (mRNA) enclosed in a lipid (fat) nanoparticle. This is a genetic code for making the SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein (in RNA form). This mRNA enters cells and provides them with instructions to produce spike proteins (RNA -> protein), then hopefully an immune response follows.4
Now, please consider the following reasons why the COVID vaccine is especially concerning, and why many doctors and health professionals have warned against it. This is not a conspiracy theory. These are facts that can be easily verified on official documents from governments agencies, health organisations and universities (all the links are provided under the article).
The vaccine has been rushed
This is the most common objection to the vaccine. It may usually take ten to fifteen years to develop a new vaccine5 but the Covid-19 vaccines have been rushed to market in a matter of months.
Clinical trials normally last a minimum of 2 years. This is the usual protocol because this is the minimum length of time that is considered necessary to evaluate vaccine effects. What does this mean? Simply that the experimental safety trials for the COVID vaccines are not over. They started in 2020, so will not end before 2022. Since the vaccines are still experimental, anybody receiving them before the end of the trial period can rightly be considered a 'Guinea pig'.
This alone is a sobering thought.
The Phase 3 clinical trial of BNT162b2 [Pfizer] began on July 27 and has enrolled 43,661 participants to date, 41,135 of whom have received a second dose of the vaccine candidate as of November 13, 2020. [...] The trial will continue to collect efficacy and safety data in participants for an additional two years.
Pfizer Inc, 18/11//206
Who can tell what the long-term adverse effects may be, when we have not allowed enough time to observe them?
The UK only gave a temporary emergency authorisation for the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines9.
Interestingly, the AstraZeneca vaccine has been rejected in Switzerland, France, Germany and Sweden due to lack of clinical studies10.
There is already a large number of adverse reactions
According to the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), an estimated 17.8 million people in the UK have received at least one dose of either the Pfizer or the AstraZeneca vaccine as of 21st February11. Up to this date, over 242,651 adverse reactions have been reported (from a total of 72,920 people). The most common reactions are pain, ‘flu-like’ illness, headache, chills, fatigue, nausea, fever, dizziness and rapid heartbeat... But these also include reports of anaphylactic shock, some facial paralysis and 460 deaths...
According to the latest Center for Disease Control (CDC) safety report, as of 16th February over 55 million people (55,220,364) in the US have already received one or more doses of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine12. The adverse events reported total 104,763. The most common adverse reactions are headaches, fatigue, dizziness, chills, fever and pain, Shortness of breath... The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) also reports COVID-19 cases, swollen faces/tongues/throats, loss of consciousness, facial paralysis, Guillain-Barré syndrome and 1,075 deaths... as of 26th February13.
Please note that the reported adverse reactions are not the total adverse reactions. Some have not been reported yet, and a 2011 study from Harvard estimated that only fewer than 1% of adverse reactions to vaccines are ever reported14. So there are potentially many more unreported reactions out there.
In Israel, a new analysis from the Israeli Health Ministry concluded that Pfizer’s COVID vaccine has already killed “about 40 times more (elderly) people than the disease itself would have killed” and "260 times more younger people than would have died from the virus"15.
Please keep in mind that all these are only short-term adverse events. Long-term reactions are far from excluded but are totally unknown since only time will tell how people are affected after months or even years (that is if they even realise that what they experience is a vaccine injury).
The fact is that all over the world, people have posted about their vaccine injuries on social media and many have unfortunately seen their videos, articles or even their whole social media account been deleted or flagged as wrong information. It seems that there are truths that should not be told...
Instead the narrative is that when people die shortly after the COVID vaccine, it is only a 'coincidence', but when people die within 28 days after a postive COVID test, it is definitely due to COVID. I am sorry, but this kind of infallible logic totally escapes me...
As you know, SARS-CoV-2 is a type of coronavirus. Scientists know that the development of other coronavirus vaccines (SARS, MERS...) have not been successful so far because they proved dangerous and even lethal in animal studies16. A concerning reaction called 'immune enhancement' has happened for every attempt at producing a coronavirus vaccine. These vaccines have caused the formation of what is called 'non-neutralizing antibodies' that create an exaggerated immune reaction.
This is a well known danger of vaccine-induced autoimmunity17. This means that vaccine recipients would be at high risk of developing an autoimmune disease when exposed to a 'wild' coronavirus following vaccination18. This will not be an immediate reaction, but may take days, weeks, months or longer to take place.
Also, in a recent study, immunologist Dr J. Bart Classen expressed concerns that mRNA vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna) could potentially put the patient at high risk of developing chronic degenerative neurological diseases, such as dementia, Alzheimer's, motor neuron disease (ALS)... and "multiple other potential fatal adverse events"19. Should we just ignore this?
Allergic reactions risks
Although vaccine ingredient lists have been released by the various manufacturers, only Moderna has specified excipients quantities.
According to Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, 3 of the excipients used in the Pfizer vaccine have never been used in a previously approved vaccine. It is unknown whether they have been tested for synergistic toxicity or allergic reactions20.
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny also mentions that the Moderna patent states that a second mRNA may be present in the vaccine (as well as the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA). This second mRNA encodes for the protein 'flagellin'. This is an unapproved vaccine adjuvant used to stimulate the cytokine (inflammatory) response of macrophages20.
Chemicals called 'polyethylene Glycol' (PEG) are present in both the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines and are known to induce serious allergic reactions, including anaphylactic shock21. These could be responsible for instantaneous adverse reactions - possibly fatal - in a great number of people (70% of people develop antibodies against PEGs). In fact, anaphylaxis has been reported a lot more frequently for these vaccines than for other vaccines.
Issues with mRNA and GMO vaccines
None of these vaccines are traditional vaccines where a full virus (antigen) is introduced to produce an immune reaction. Here, we are instructing the body itself to produce the antigen. There is no "off" button, so how long this will take place in the body is anyone's guess...
This vaccination lets a stranger* into the gates of your body that will work 24/7 to destroy what God has made.
This vaccine robs you of a pure human bloodline.
Celeste Solum, Ex-FEMA whistleblower25
mRNA vaccines have never before been used on humans; and animal trials have proven unsuccessful26. Certain scientists, such as Dr David Martin or the geneticist Dr Alexandra Henrion-Caude, do not call them "vaccines", but "gene therapies", "genetical engineering" or "medical devices". This is because, according to them, their mechanism of action is completely different; it involves injecting sequences of genetic material (rather than traditionally a complete virus) and could potentially have unknown effects on human DNA (including gene modification and heredity).
mRNA naturally exists in the body. However, natural mRNA is broken down after its use by a group of enzymes, known as an RNA-ase, soon after it has accomplished its mission of protein synthesis. But according to Dr. Judy Mikovits, the synthetic mRNA in the mRNA vaccines is protected by blocking the action of the RNAase. This means that once injected into the system, it could stay there for years; its longevity is unknown. So the mRNA could instruct the recipient's cells to continually produce the virus proteins - potentially for ever... Who knows the long-term consequences of this?
GMO adenovirus-based vaccines like the AstraZeneca are also relatively new (at least to humans). Similarly, this vaccine could modify the human genome as the adenovirus modified DNA enters the cell. What this may mean for human health and reproduction is unknown, and negative impacts cannot ever be corrected. This could well be permanent.
Vaccine manufacturers insist that recipients' DNA cannot be altered, but as Dr Carrie Madej pointed out, the process used is the same as with genetically modified food27, so why would we not get the same result in humans?26 There is already evidence that GMO foods can affect human DNA28 29 30. How much more when an genetically modified organism is directly injected?
Our DNA is the humanity 'instruction code' that God gave us, it is what makes us human at the cellular level. Should we not be concerned - even if there is only a remote risk for our DNA to be altered? The genetic material in these vaccines is instructing cells to manufacture something (a protein) God never intended human cells to manufacture. Do we know better than Him?...
As if that is not enough, the AstraZeneca vaccine also contains fragments of the HIV virus, DNA sequences from malaria and 157 additional DNA and protein sequences (patent US 8,243,718 B2), whose presence and role are unexplained31 32.
Firstly, as said above, the vaccines are still in experimental phase; and testing the vaccine on humans (without their clear knowledge and consent) should be considered unethical.
Secondly, Pope Francis may find the use of cell lines derived from aborted foetuses 'morally acceptable', but hopefully this is not our point of reference. So what about aborted cells?
According to Dr Meredith Wadman and Dr Francis Collins, the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines do not use aborted foetal cells for their production33. In fact, they are not made in cells, but using specific chemicals; however, vaccine testing does happen in fetal cell lines.
And sadly, among the main candidates, 2 other vaccines - namely Janssen (not yet available to market) and AstraZeneca - were produced using 2 foetal cell lines33. Note that a cell line is never developed from a single abortion, but several34.
Some are of the opinion that because the abortions happened in the past and that no new abortions took place for the development of the vaccine, there is no real issue. Everyone should act according to conscience. However, we need to be aware that new foetal cell lines are still under development34 and accepting a vaccine made with these cells could be a way of encouraging such practices. Why would the industry change their processes if we do not object by boycotting their vaccines?
Another ethical concern is synthetic recombinant DNA and mRNA patents, and ownership.
Dr. Madej says that synthetic RNA and DNA are not from nature and can therefore be patented. Patents have owners and so if this synthetic material gets into our genome will the owner of the patent own us? She also raises concerns about a substance called Luciferase in the vaccines used to produce light when scanned. Your vaccination records and vaccination number could be scanned into a dot the size of a felt-tipped pen mark, making human beings into a "product".
Faith, Trust or Science - The COVID Vaccine Part 126
On 1st December 2020, retired Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr Michael Yeadon and lung specialist and former head of public health Dr Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the European Medicine Agency demanding the immediate suspension of all SARS-CoV-2 vaccine studies. They requested that the "significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists" be addressed, one of them being the fertility issue36.
The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon36
In a nutshell, this means that there is a risk for pregnant women to have an immune reaction against the formation of their own placenta, making pregnancy impossible.
A few spontaneous abortions have already been reported by the VAERS13.
The manufacturers do not mention the presence of mercury (thimerosal) or other dangerous preservatives such as aluminium in the COVID-19 Vaccines37 38 39. Hopefully, this is true. However, I am not aware of any independent laboratry cross checking the vaccines ingredients to verify this, so we can only take their word for it.
What we know is that the AstraZeneca vaccine contains an emulsifier called Polysorbate 8037. Evidence suggests that this ingredient is potentially toxic40 41. Some studies have found a link between Polysorbate 80 and infertility in mice42. Others have found a real connection between ingesting Polysorbate 80 and the development of bowel problems, including exacerbation of Crohn’s Disease. It seems that the risk is small, but not inexistant43 44.
The AstraZeneca vaccine also contains the compound disodium edetate dihydrate37. This chemical is considered a health hazard. According to PubChem, it is harmful if swallowed, harmful in contact with skin, harmful if inhaled, causes damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure and harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects45. I could not find any specific data on harm when injected, but of course no one would inject something that has been proven harmful when swallowed, inhaled and in contact with skin...
Additionally, as said earlier, the potential synergistic toxicity of new excipients in the Pfizer vaccine is unknown.
Nanoparticles are extremely small particles, measuring 100 nm or less. Their small size allows them to easily penetrate into biological molecules in the body and cross cell membranes47.
Some nanoparticles do not degrade or dissolve readily. That means they may remain in the body for an unknown amount of time, which is concerning as there is uncertainty as to what the effects of this would be. This is a relatively new technology and nanoparticles' interactions with living organisms are not fully understood yet48.
It has even been claimed that these nanoparticles could be a means to connect people to Artificial Intelligence (AI) via the 5G networks. They could be a way to implement a new cryptocurrency (virtual money) system using body activity data46. I do not know for sure that this is the case, but it is reasonable to say that more research and hindsight would be desirable before venturing into including nanotechnology into vaccines.
Legal immunity to manufacturers
In the UK and USA, as well as in many other countries, manufacturers such as Pfizer, Moderna and Oxford AstraZeneca cannot be legally taken to court for damages due to their vaccines. They have been granted protection from all liability49 50 51. Are you comfortable with using a product which safety cannot be guaranteed by the people who produce it?
Governments have agreed that due to the urgency of the situation and the rush with which these vaccines have been produced, they should not be held responsible if anything goes wrong. In the UK, you may be entitled to a one-off payment (£120,000) in case of severe disability caused by the vaccine 52 - but do not expect any compensation from the pharmaceutical industry. That is definitely a win-win situation for them, so why should they be concerned about our safety? Sadly, their only incentive is money.
Carlo Brusa, a lawyer in France, has filed a complaint asking that people be able to request a signed declaration from their doctors before receiving the COVID vaccine. In this declaration, doctors giving the vaccine would guarantee their legal responsibility in case of any harm caused53. Isn't this brilliant?
"First do no harm..." No doctor who abide by their hypocratic oath would be able to sign this.
Necessity of the vaccine
According to the Center for Disease Control in the United States, Covid-19 has a mortality rate of 0.005 for those aged 50 to 69 and 0.054 for those aged over 70. The rates for those aged under 50 are much lower and deaths are virtually non-existant in children. So even if you are over 70 and you contract Covid-19, you have a 94.6% chance of survival. If you are in the 50-69 age bracket, your chance of survival is 99.5 %.
Rachael Parsons, Faith, Trust or Science? – The COVID Vaccine 26
According to a WHO study by Prof. John P. A. Ioannidis, the median COVID-19 infection fatality rate is estimated at 0.27% 54.
PCR tests have been shown to be inappropriate to diagnose COVID, so any extravagant number of 'cases' generated by these positive tests is meaningless. RT-PCR was actually never meant to be a diagnosis tool according to its inventor, Kary Mullis55. It is a tool used to make copies of strands of DNA for genetic research, so essentially this is not even a test 56.
Besides, what is the use of a vaccine when good treatments are available? And several medical treatments are known and available 59 60, despite shameful attempts by authorities to undermine their use.
Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has never been isolated from patients, so its very existence is still unproven61. Vaccinating against something we do not even know exists completely defies reason. But, sshhh! You did not hear me say that...
If nothing else, our common sense must kick in when health authorities tell us that after receiving the COVID vaccine:
- we should still wear a face mask
- we should still social distance
- we can still transmit the virus
- we can still get infected with COVID62
If the vaccine does not stop infection or transmission, logic would ask: "What is the vaccine for then?" If you know the answer to this one, please let me know because I am still trying to work it out!
Above all, what about our natural immunity? God provided us with a wonderful immune system. Shouldn't we be grateful for it instead of looking out for the world's solution? Shouldn't we honour God by learning how to care for it and enhance it?
I will praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made; Marvelous are Your works, and that my soul knows very well.
Believe me, I have just scratched the surface here. There is so much more to these vaccines and a lot of it is much too technical for most of us to understand. However, we can understand enough to know they are dangerous and full of uncertainties; and I hope I was able to properly explain this.
Maybe you expected some 'pro' arguments to balance with the cons. Unfortunately, I can't think of any (that is, apart from providing a few billionaires with tons of money). I hope and pray that we will all receive wisdom and discernment from the Lord as I do believe there is a sinister agenda behind the vaccines (but I'll leave that to your own judgment).
Jesus warned us of great deception in the last days:
Take heed that no one deceives you.
There is definitely a lot of spiritual deception today, but I have found that there is equally great deception in the natural sphere. The number of people - including Church leaders - blinded by their trust in the world system, who rush to take this vaccine is only evidence of that unfortunately.
This is a long article, but at the end of the day there is only one sensible question to be asked regarding the vaccines: Are they safe and effective? (the safety being the most important aspect of course). And neither safety nor efficacy can in any way be guaranteed with the COVID vaccines.
Anyone who says the COVID-19 jab is completely safe and effective is lying!
Dr Vernon Coleman
Whatever your decision, you must know that you have the legal right to refuse the vaccine if you wish and you have the right to wait (in the UK and most countries, there is no mandate). You also have the right to informed consent regarding all the benefits and risks associated with the vaccine, which is rarely fully given by medical authorities nowadays.
Please share this information far and wide with as many as you think would benefit from it. Did I miss out something? Or did this article make you think twive about the vaccine? Feel free to write your comments or ask questions below.
Doctors & Health Professionals from all Over the World Warn Against the COVID Vaccine:
Alternative video link
1. Pfizer “just like Jesus” says UK Health Sec (09/12/20):
2. ‘It Was Like A Gift From God That Came Out Of Nowhere’: Mental Health Professionals Grateful For COVID Vaccine (01/01/21):
3. How the Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Works:
4. COVID-19 vaccine: What’s RNA research got to do with it?
5. Vaccine Development, Testing, and Regulation:
6. Pfizer And BioNTech Conclude Phase 3 Study Of Covid-19 Vaccine Candidate, Meeting All Primary Efficacy Endpoints (18/11/20):
7. FDA Pfizer vaccine factsheet:
8. FDA Moderna vaccine factsheet:
9. NHS Information for the recipient - COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca solution for injection:
10. Switzerland REFUSES to approve AstraZeneca jab and says 'new studies' are needed after France, Germany and Sweden rejected it for over-65s:
11. MHRA COVID-19 vaccines adverse reactions reports:
12. CDC Pfizer & Moderna vaccines latest safety report:
13. VAERS COVID-19 vaccine adverse events Database:
https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=SYM&TSORT=down&VAX=COVID19 (saved search)
or https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html (select COVID vaccines and search database)
14. Harvard study - underreported vaccine adverse reactions:
15. Israel New Analysis: Pfizer Vaccine Killed ‘About 40 Times More Elderly Than the Disease Itself Would Have Killed’:
16. Failure of SARS and MERS vaccines in animal trials (Immune Enhancement/autoimmunity):
17. The COVID Vaccines – part 2 (coronavirus vaccines and monkeys):
18. Anti–spike IgG causes severe acute lung injury by skewing macrophage responses during acute SARS-CoV infection:
19. COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease, Dr J. Bart Classen:
20. The COVID Vaccines – part 1, by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny:
21. Polyethylene Glycol-Induced Systemic Allergic Reactions (Anaphylaxis):
22. WHO - The Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine: what you need to know:
23. WHO - Who can take the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine?
24. WHO - The Moderna COVID-19 (mRNA-1273) vaccine: what you need to know:
25. 10 Commandments & The Vaccine ($2.99 ebook):
26. Faith, Trust or Science? – The COVID Vaccine:
27. What is genetic modification (GM) of crops and how is it done?
28. Does Your Body Absorb Genetically Engineered DNA?
29. Exogenous plant MIR168a specifically targets mammalian LDLRAP1: evidence of cross-kingdom regulation by microRNA:
30. Growing fatter on a GM diet:
31. The Whole Truth Covid-19 & Covid-19 Vaccines - Prof. Jean-Bernard Fourtillan, Dr. Tal Schaller, Dr. Serge Rader & Frédéric Chaumont:
32. STRAIN OF SARS-ASSOCIATED CORONAVIRUS AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF Patent (Patent US 8,243,718 B2):
33. COVID Vaccines and Fetal Cells: What’s Ethical and What Isn’t?
34. Abortion, the Human Fetal Cell Industry & Vaccines:
35. Charlotte Lozier Institute - COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates and Abortion-Derived Cell Lines:
37. Information for Healthcare Professionals on COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca (NHS):
38. Information for UK healthcare professionals on the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine (NHS, slide 10):
39. COVID-19 Vaccines: Update on Allergic Reactions, Contraindications, and Precautions (CDC, slide 20):
40. What Is Polysorbate 80 And Why Should You Avoid It?
41. Polysorbate 80: a pharmacological study:
42. Delayed effects of neonatal exposure to Tween 80 on female reproductive organs in rats:
43. Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome:
44. Translocation of Crohn's disease Escherichia coli across M-cells: contrasting effects of soluble plant fibres and emulsifiers:
45. PubChem - Disodium edetate dihydrate:
46. Nanoparticles in AstraZeneca vaccine and cryptocurrency system (Microsoft Patent PCT/ U S201 9/ 038084):
47. European Commission Public Health - Questions on Nanotechnologies:
48. The appropriateness of existing methodologies to assess the potential risks associated with engineered and adventitious products of nanotechnologies:
49. Coronavirus vaccine: Pfizer given protection from legal action by UK government:
50. AstraZeneca to be exempt from coronavirus vaccine liability claims in most countries:
51. NY Times - Governments Sign Secret Vaccine Deals. Here’s What They Hide:
52. UK Vaccine Damage Payment:
53. Reaction-19 - Plainte relatives aux vaccins:
54. Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data, by Prof. John Ioannidis:
55. Polymerase Chain Reaction, Kary Mullis:
56. David Jay Brown Interviews Kary Mullis (RT-PCR):
57. Medical Practitioners Say No Medical Pandemic Nor Vaccine Urgency, by Judy Wilyman PhD (pandemic of PCR testing):
58. The Wrong Pandemic, by Dr Arthur Firstenberg (pandemic of insanity/pandemic of radiation):
59. CURES for COVID-19, Confirmed by Medical Experts:
60. Review: Vitamin C – an Adjunctive Therapy for Respiratory Infection, Sepsis and COVID-19:
61. Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory:
62. NHS - What to expect after your COVID-19 vaccination: